Screening Intelligence
AI-assisted review of sanctions, PEP, watchlist and name-screening alerts.
Agentic AML is TA Tech's human-supervised compliance platform. It helps teams analyse alerts, prepare customer reviews, investigate suspicious activity and produce consistent case documentation — complementing existing screening, monitoring, KYC and case-management systems.
AI-assisted compliance across the customer and transaction lifecycle. Institutions can adopt individual modules or implement a connected operating environment over time.
AI-assisted review of sanctions, PEP, watchlist and name-screening alerts.
Multilingual identification, classification and summarisation of relevant negative news.
Alert enrichment, transaction analysis, risk prioritisation and investigation support.
Customer-data analysis, periodic review automation and CDD/EDD workflow support.
Case summarisation, evidence consolidation, workflow automation and investigator assistance.
Dynamic segmentation, risk scoring and explainable customer-risk analysis.
Entity resolution, relationship mapping and transaction-network analysis.
Assistance with investigation narratives, management reporting and STR preparation.
Quality assurance, workflow controls, model monitoring and auditable decision records.
Agentic AML is designed around the daily reality of the compliance team: a prioritised queue, a single investigation pane, governed decisions and tunable models. These are the designed working views of the platform.
Previews below are illustrative static views — not live data.
The analyst's primary inbox. Alerts arrive from existing monitoring systems and are sorted by AI risk score — highest risk first, not chronological — with false-positive probabilities shown per alert.
A decision-support workspace for each alert: the AI's risk breakdown, a recommended judgement, and a drafted narrative the analyst can regenerate and edit.
One consolidated workspace per case: consolidated AI view, customer, account, transactions and network analytics — no switching between systems.
The transactions view doubles as a forensic workspace: AI observations, aggregated financial metrics, rule-hit analysis and granular ledger data.
Closing an alert or filing a report is a governed action: mandatory reasons, routed approvals and a feedback loop into model improvement.
A simulator for tuning monitoring rules and model thresholds — what-if analysis validated against historical outcomes before anything changes in production.
The workspace separates the compliance analyst (maker) who investigates and drafts, from the compliance manager (approver) who reviews and decides — with quality-assurance review and administrator-configured routing on top. AI prepares; authorised people decide.
Connect customer, account, transaction, screening, KYC and case information from existing systems.
Add customer context, historical activity, relationships, risk indicators and external information.
Apply rules, analytics and AI-assisted reasoning to identify risks and investigation priorities.
Present evidence, source references, timelines, related parties and recommended next steps.
Require authorised personnel to review material findings, recommendations and proposed decisions.
Record the information considered, actions taken, decision reasons, approvals and model versions.
Monitor outcomes and refine rules, workflows and models under controlled governance processes.
Regulatory filing decisions and final reports remain under the control of authorised compliance personnel.
Agentic AML connects to the systems your institution already runs — adopting individual modules without automatically requiring replacement of the AML technology stack.
Our delivery team covers requirements analysis, API development, data mapping, testing and parallel-run support as part of implementation.
Integration services →Financial-crime risks do not exist in isolation. Customer information, screening results, transactions, alerts, investigations and regulatory reports must be understood together. TA Tech connects these processes through modular technology and implementation services that complement existing compliance environments. Our AML capabilities cover:
Designed to align with FATF AML/CFT recommendations and international financial-crime-compliance standards.
Analyse potential matches against sanctions, PEP and other relevant watchlists using configurable matching logic and AI-assisted review.
Help compliance teams identify, categorise and assess relevant negative news more efficiently.
Support the detection and investigation of unusual, suspicious or prohibited activity across customer transactions.
Apply configurable risk indicators to help compliance teams focus on higher-priority cases.
Create more consistent customer reviews by connecting customer information, risk indicators, screening results and supporting documentation.
Reduce manual preparation work associated with scheduled and event-driven customer reviews.
Reassess customer risk as information and behaviour change over time.
Give investigators a consolidated view of relevant information, evidence and actions.
Reveal relationships that may not be visible when customers and transactions are reviewed individually.
Assist authorised personnel with preparing consistent and evidence-based suspicious transaction reports.
Help institutions maintain consistent investigation standards and demonstrate effective control.
Investigate faster. Document consistently. Keep people in control.
Agentic AML applies AI to repetitive and information-intensive compliance activities while maintaining governance and human accountability.
AI prepares draft narratives and consolidates evidence, but review, amendment and approval remain with authorised compliance personnel — by design.
Book a Demonstration →Designed to complement your existing systems — not necessarily replace them.
| Traditional AML operations | With Agentic AML | |
|---|---|---|
| Information | Fragmented across screening, monitoring, KYC and case systems | Connected view across customer, transaction, screening and case data |
| Alert handling | Manual triage of high alert volumes | Risk-based prioritisation with reason codes and similar-case context |
| Investigations | Manual evidence gathering and write-up | AI-assisted case summaries, timelines and evidence references |
| Documentation | Hand-written narratives under time pressure | Draft narratives prepared for human review and approval |
| Accountability | Decisions and reasons recorded inconsistently | Decision reasons, approvals and model versions recorded |
| Governance evidence | Assembled manually for audits | Audit trails and quality-assurance checks designed in |
No. It is designed to operate alongside existing screening, transaction-monitoring, KYC, case-management and core banking systems. Institutions can adopt individual modules without replacing their entire AML technology stack.
Authorised compliance personnel. AI analyses information and prepares recommendations, but material decisions — alert closure, customer-risk approval and suspicious transaction reporting — remain subject to human review and approval.
On-premises, in private clouds, in locally hosted dedicated environments or through hybrid architectures — subject to each institution's cybersecurity, data-residency and privacy requirements.
Yes. TA Tech provides Chinese and English implementation, documentation, training and customer support for organisations across Macau, Hong Kong and the Greater Bay Area.
Start with a controlled proof of concept using an agreed scope, controlled dataset and measurable evaluation criteria — or begin with an AML Health Check to establish your baseline.
A controlled proof of concept lets your team evaluate quality, explainability and efficiency against agreed criteria.